Developer Utility · Latency
Multi-Region Hosting Latency Selector
Hosting near "most" of your users isn't the same as minimizing latency for all of them. Enter your user breakdown and this finds the region with the lowest population-weighted round-trip time — and whether splitting across regions is worth it.
Multi-Region Hosting Selector
Enter your user distribution. The tool ranks host regions by population-weighted latency and tells you whether a split deployment is worth it.
40.1 ms weighted RTT
A multi-region split (us-east-1, eu-west-2, eu-central-1) cuts weighted latency to 8.8 ms — saving 31.3 ms. Worth considering.
Best two-region deployment: us-east-1 + eu-west-2 at 10.9 ms (29.2 ms better than the single best).
eu-west-2
8.8
How it works
For each candidate host region j, we compute the average latency your users would experience, weighted by where they actually are. The winner minimizes that weighted average:
best = arg minj Σi Pᵢ × Lᵢⱼ
Latency Lᵢⱼ is estimated
from great-circle distance using a fiber-propagation model (speed of light in fiber × a routing
overhead, plus a base). It's a solid first-order guide — not a substitute for real benchmarks.
Single region or split?
We also route every user region to its nearest host and report that lower-bound latency. If the split saves only a few milliseconds, one region keeps things simple. If it saves tens of milliseconds (common for truly global audiences), a multi-region deploy with geo-routing pays off.
For deployment agents
CI/CD and deployment agents can pick a default region programmatically:
GET /api/region.json?users=US-East:40,UK:30,Germany:30.
The response ranks all host regions, names the best, and returns the optimal split. Declared in
/.well-known/mcp.json
and described in /llms.txt.